Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 67/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 72/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.12/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
827K
1M
Completed sessions
120,088,315
11,812,144
Token share
15.3%
3.15%
Tokens
164T+100%
34T-11%
AUG 26OCT 20
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.6%10K user-weeks
62.9%92K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba LargeGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba Large