Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 91/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.12/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.000566/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.9M
826K
Completed sessions
68,551,814
120,038,748
Token share
29%
15.3%
Tokens
310T+100%
163T+100%
AUG 26OCT 20
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%317K user-weeks
75.6%10K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Large