Compare AI models: Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 72/100 | 95/100 | 7/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 47/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$5.00/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$25/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
828K
Completed sessions
3
120,184,503
Token share
0%
15.4%
Tokens
00%
165T+100%
No trend data
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
75.6%10K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Opus 4.8 vs Jamba MiniClaude Opus 4.8·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Opus 4.8 vs Jamba LargeClaude Opus 4.8·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Large