Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 3.5 v2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Claude Sonnet 3.5 v2AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Claude Sonnet 3.5 v2	0/100 — Reasoning not supported	40/100	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	46/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	67/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

200K

Reasoning

False

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Pdf

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

Unknown

$0.15/ 1M

Output

Unknown

$0.60/ 1M

Cached input

Unknown

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

828K

Completed sessions

120,184,503

Token share

15.4%

Tokens

00%

165T+100%

No trend data

AUG 26OCT 20

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

75.6%10K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.