Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 82/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 27/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.23/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
41K
119K
Completed sessions
825,434
487,831
Token share
0.02%
0.02%
Tokens
252B+100%
256B+33%
AUG 26OCT 20
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
45.4%6.1K user-weeks