Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 67/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.3M
264K
Completed sessions
29,529,473
15,067,892
Token share
10.3%
0.81%
Tokens
110T-57%
8.7T+100%
AUG 26OCT 20
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.1%194K user-weeks
63.8%1.7K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba Large