GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Kimi K2.5MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10067/10081/10033/10092/100
Kimi K2.550/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark20/10039/10063/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$3.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.9M
8.5K
Completed sessions
68,737,075
13,815
Token share
29.1%
0%
Tokens
310T+100%
3.4B-93%
AUG 26OCT 20
AUG 26OCT 20
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%317K user-weeks
72.9%133 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.